Does the word realism have any meaning to you as an actor? > No. When you say realism, I think of naturalism, and I think about natural acting. And when I think about natural acting, I think about natural behavior. And I think sometimes that destroys movies, you know? Because we don’t just want to see imitations of life. We want to see something that is beyond that. Cinema is not just about telling stories. Everybody clings to this. Telling stories, telling stories, telling stories! It’s about light. It’s about space. It’s about tone. It’s about color. It’s about people having experiences in front of you, where, if it’s transparent enough, they can experience it with you. You become them. They become you. That’s the communion. That’s the experience. Wow. You’ve just summarized my entire philosophy of what cinema is. I don’t really care much about plot. > I don’t either! But we’re all different. My wife is always going, “Don’t tell me what happens.” I couldn’t care less. Tell me the whole story! When I watch it, I’m going to forget about where it goes anyway. It’s not about what happens. It’s about how things happen. Because there’s nothing new under the sun.

HTML isn’t only for people working in the tech field. It’s for anybody, the way documents are for anybody. HTML is just another type of document. A very special one—the one the web is built on.

In the Republican party, populist discontent is the mainstream. In the Democratic party, that's excommunicable. People who’ve eschewed traditional media in favor of content creators aren’t just looking for information, opinions, or to have preconceived notions validated. They’re looking for aspirational figures – people they can try not just to think like, but be like. That, to some extent, is what a Joe Rogan or a Theo Von or, more regrettably, an Adin Ross offers. It’s also what viewers see in Piker, who posts pics and videos of his fits and his fitness progress in addition to streaming political commentary.

The art of weaving is synonymous within cultural femininity. Textile art has always had a distinct connection to feminine labor, passed down through countless cultures and generations of women.  Yet, this culturally rich feminine tradition now stands in stark contrast against its counterpart of Western capitalism's relentlessness. Today, the textile industry, especially in the exploited global South's satellite garment production hotspots like Bangladesh and Hanoi, subjugates the exploitation of the over 80% female labor force. By turning sacred matriarchal art into a vital crutch that survives off manipulation and inhumane conditions--in the broader, modern global context--it has become reduced to a differential within the fast fashion industry. Fashion is beyond and less than what it is made out to be; it is a commodity structured from the process and creative labor, both a mirror and a maker of our societal trends, a reflection and a distortion. As both parent and child of capitalism, it thrives and relies on all forms of capitalism; a basic human need, yet simultaneously utterly superfluous. Whatever constitutes the truth of fashion literally lies in the intersection of contradiction. 

https://bsky.app/profile/techconnectify.bsky.social/post/3lacb3cbwgn2k For fuck's sake, don't fight over why this happened. Do not make your pet issue into your identity. Fucking work togethe...